[Dovecot] plugin problem
johannes at sipsolutions.net
Mon Oct 1 23:01:42 EEST 2007
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 12:44 -0700, Tom Bombadil wrote:
> Really? I found the downside of using signatures much worse than not
> using them:
> If the backend is mysql, eventually, we have to clean, and optimize the
> signature tables... And the optimization locks the table. Needless to
> say, all inbound mail can't be written to the signatures table.
> Now, if you have a lot of users, your table optimization could take
> hours to finish. Postgres has the same problem if you use a 'vacuum full'.
Ah, yeah, that could be a problem. I use css at the moment so each mail
signature is a single file it simply blows away when no longer needed.
Right now I'm looking into migrating to crm114 for the fun of it ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20071001/b26dc440/attachment.bin
More information about the dovecot