dovecot-pigeonhole running external script ends with signal 11

[Tobi]

Hi Stephan

thanks for insisting on the pigeonhole version. That seems to be the reason. With 0.4.16 I built the rpms again and after yum install on my mailbox servers the script "terminated normally"

Just one thing that does not go in my brain so far: in 1 out of maybe 20 cases the script worked with 0.4.14 without an error. But thats not important as with 0.4.16 it works in 100% of processed mails so far.

Again thanks a lot for the great help here and happy mailing

tobi

----- Originale Nachricht -----
Von: Tobi <tobster at brain-force.ch>
Gesendet: 08.01.17 - 12:22
An: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org>
Betreff: Re: dovecot-pigeonhole running external script ends with signal 11

> Hi Stephan
> 
> currently the rpm is built based on 0.4.14
> Should I try with 0.4.16? I will build it again this afternoon with the version you suggested and report back with the results.
> 
> Thanks for the help here
> 
> tobi
> 
> ----- Originale Nachricht -----
> Von: Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl>
> Gesendet: 08.01.17 - 11:00
> An: tobster at brain-force.ch@pgp.brain-force.ch,
> 	Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org>
> Betreff: Re: dovecot-pigeonhole running external script ends with signal 11
> 
>> Op 1/8/2017 om 10:00 AM schreef Tobi:
>>> Hi Stephan
>>>
>>> according to ps aux the process that segfaults is (pid 18261)
>>>
>>> vmail    18261  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/0    Z    09:39   0:00 [lmtp]
>>> <defunct>
>>>
>>> the gdb backtrace I attached to my mail was the deepest one I got
>> 
>> That looks like it happens in Dovecot still.
>> 
>>> @Steffen
>>> the script does not chroot, at least not that I'm aware of. I checked my
>>> dovecot configs and could not find any active chroot config. All
>>> occurences of mail_chroot are commented out and have no path values.
>> 
>> What about the version information I asked about?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Stephan.
>> 
>>> Am 06.01.2017 um 00:04 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
>>>> Op 1/4/2017 om 9:37 AM schreef Tobi:
>>>>> Hi Aki
>>>>>
>>>>> yes I built dovecot and pigeonhole rpms in the same rpmbuild. pigeonhole
>>>>> rpm is based on 0.4.14
>>>>> Do you think that the error might come from self building the rpms?
>>>> But what version of Pigeonhole are you actually using? Version 0.4.16 is
>>>> released for Dovecot v2.2.26.
>>>>
>>>> Also:
>>>>
>>>> - Can you find out which process is getting the segfault? GDB shows the
>>>> pid and you should lookup what process that is while GDB is still active.
>>>> - Isn't that GDB backtrace you provided deeper? It shows only two
>>>> levels, but that makes no sense (i.e. main() is not listed).
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Stephan.
>>>>
>> 
>