[Dovecot] 0.99.10-test13
Zach Bagnall
zach.bagnall at bulletinwireless.com
Wed Jun 18 07:38:00 EEST 2003
Can anyone pinpoint exactly when SSL began to have problems?
I'm using 0.9.99.1 on two servers:
- Redhat 7.3 with openssl-0.9.6b-30.7
- Gentoo with openssl-0.9.6i
The Redhat server serves about 30 users, some POP3, some IMAP. At least
half use SSL (because they're ouside the LAN).
I haven't had any problem, so I'm just wondering when these errors began.
Zach.
On 18 Jun 2003 04:42:01 +0300, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
> http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/
>
> - Hopefully OpenSSL is fixed :)
> - We sometimes produced invalid ENVELOPE with 8bit headers. That could
> really have broken things (broke it in test12).
>
> So, what's left is to make PAM work well..
>
--
Services & Support
Bulletin Wireless | www.bulletinwireless.com
This email is digitally signed | Key ID 0x3F9AA9A2
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20030618/56b344d1/attachment-0003.bin>
More information about the dovecot
mailing list