[dovecot] Re: FETCH BODY[part]<partial>

[Jesse Peterson]

Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 21:53, Jesse Peterson wrote:
> 
>>This CVS update didn't actually seem to fix the problem.  I still get 
>>the problem as before, like this capture:
>>
>>
>>10 UID FETCH 60 BODY.PEEK[]<8192.1915>
>>* 60 FETCH (UID 60 BODY[]<8192> {1915}
>>
>>)
>>10 OK Fetch completed.
> 
> 
> Does this happen every time now? What if you run the "imap" binary
> directly and ask this? What if you skip the first block and ask only the
> second? Is the message really 10107 bytes long?

I'll give all these a try and let you know.

> 
> 
>>Not quite 1,915 bytes =).  Perhaps the "[]" (without a part) is 
>>confusing it?  But still, it grabs the first chunk correctly.  At any 
>>rate, any input would be great.
> 
> 
> I can't get this to break with me..

Could it possibly be that my indexes (from before the update) were 
screwed and deleteing them would help?  Maybe it cached the body or 
summin, I'll do it anyways to be sure.