[Dovecot] entourage + dovecot bug?

[Gunter Ohrner]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Donnerstag, 20. November 2003 20:23 schrieb Payton:
> Following that advice, I used tethereal to dump a test transaction of both
> setups. Comparing the IMAP chatter, there is basically no difference! In

The flags returned for INBOX differ:

"Response: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft NotJunk Junk)"

Maybe entourage chokes on the last two ones? The "\" seems to be missing, 
which has already been mentioned as a bug on this list IIRC. However that#s 
just a wild and blind guess as I virtually know nothing about the IMAP 
protocol in paticular.

Greetings,

  Gunter

- -- 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+                   PGP-verschlüsselte Mails bevorzugt!                 +
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
<frogman> how can i tell if i am getting attacked by another computer?
<jedd> frogman: you'll have keyboard imprints on your forehead.
        -- Life in irc://irc.freenode.org/#debian
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ http://www.lspace.org +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/v+B+0ORHvREo8l8RAlSLAJ9Bqg6QBPgLnbMMth5a7KcHiJyJSwCfTwfw
lvyB1Hpk2J5KhDJS8WIMBbQ=
=cOMR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----