[Dovecot] delivery agent in 1.0?

[Mark E. Mallett]

On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 12:55:17PM -0500, Jim Trigg wrote:
> On Thu, December 23, 2004 12:38 pm, Mark E. Mallett said:
> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 05:52:12PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >> Hmm. This brings to my mind again that it would need Sieve, and mvmf
> >> might be a good base for it, but it's still not open source (Mark? :)
> >
> > Only because I'm too lazy to deal with thinking about terms, certainly
> > that was more true a year ago when it was less well developed.  And
> > maybe because I'm not clear on the what the problems are with the terms
> > right now.  e.g. qmail is "closed" in similar way.  But all the source
> > code is there for the taking.
> 
> Well, first it would help if a person could determine what the terms *are*
> without downloading the source code.  Putting the contents of LICENSE on
> the web site would be a good start.

Good point.

It comes back to that lazy thing again.

Plus, what do you say when you don't have anything to say?
But yeah, a file that doesn't say much is probably better than the
lack of one.

I've added the relevant files.

mm