[Dovecot] delivery agent in 1.0?

[Timo Sirainen]

On 23.12.2004, at 20:08, Kenneth Porter wrote:

> --On Thursday, December 23, 2004 5:52 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen 
> <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> I'll need to implement one in next few months, so yes.
>
> Would it be practical to implement it as a new back-end in procmail? 
> Would the procmail maintainers be open to adding new back-ends, or 
> abstracting the mailbox interface to a plugin architecture?

The problem with procmail is its code. Once I spent an hour trying to 
figure out how a certain function in it was called. It only went 
through a few functions, but the code was unbelievably complex. I'd 
rather not want to ever look at it again.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20041223/adad7867/PGP.pgp