[Dovecot] Lost messages with Mozilla and dovecot 0.99.x

[Timo Sirainen]

On 21.9.2004, at 19:07, John Peacock wrote:

> Do you think it is worthwhile to add a subset of what rawlog does to 
> the server process output?  I'll enable rawlog and see what that gives 
> me and then make a more specific proposal (possibly with a patch to go 
> with it ;).

I haven't yet really decided on how much to add logging code.. It can 
be useful for debugging and statistics, but it also bloats.

One thing that I was thinking about was to make rawlog optionally save 
only client input.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20040922/6137ca5e/PGP.pgp