[Dovecot] Documentation

[Timo Sirainen]

On 25.7.2005, at 19:10, Enrique Perez-Terron wrote:

> Could I suggest a thing? Could you have an explicit call on new users 
> to write a few words about their experiences and frustrations with 
> Dovecot, whatever they are, some place where they are likely to see 
> it?

That could be useful, but the biggest problem with Dovecot currently is 
its version numbering mess. 0.99.x has many problems and I don't really 
want to hear about them anymore. It's however still the "stable" 
version, so people use it.. Something always seems to be broken in 
1.0-tests (although test79 looks good so far), and 1.0-stable is 
missing support for keywords..

Once 1.0-tests get to the point that it's stable enough to fully 
depricate 0.99.x, then these kind of surveys are much more important. 
Before that I think it'd only waste time. That's also the reason why I 
haven't yet bothered all that much to write documentation..
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20050726/78c4b287/PGP.pgp