[Dovecot] New mailbox format
John Peacock
jpeacock at rowman.com
Fri Sep 23 17:01:52 EEST 2005
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> The point is to have a mailbox format where the mailbox can consist of one
> or more files. Grouping multiple files in a single file makes it faster to
> read, but it's slower to expunge mails from the beginning of the file. So
> this format would allow sysadmin to specify rules on how large the files
> would be allowed to grow.
This seems like a lot of complexity for an unknown amount of
performance. Sure, it is going to be loads faster than multi-megabyte
mbox mailboxes, but you can color me unconvinced that this will be a
significant win over maildir. The primary advantage to maildir is the
utter simplicity of all operations; at no time do you need to completely
rewrite any files and all operations are 100% atomic. The index format
under maildir is also very simple, since you only need to keep track of
the filename (and flags) rather than filename and offset and flags. And
with modern filesystems, disk access is intelligently cached.
If you are trying to tune for where there are significant numbers of
very small (< 2k) files (well smaller than the typical block size in the
underlying filesystem), you may be aiming too small. It looks like the
median file size in my maildir folders is about 3100 bytes. What sizes
were you thinking the typical admin would set as the limit?
Personally, I think your time would be better spent integrating a
database message store and let the database engine deal with storage and
indexing issues. YMMV. ;-)
John
--
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
More information about the dovecot
mailing list