[Dovecot] 1.0 roadmap - fs quota problem
Timo Sirainen
tss at iki.fi
Tue Jun 13 02:08:06 EEST 2006
On Jun 13, 2006, at 12:53 AM, Chris H. wrote:
> Wow. We never should have switched from UW-IMAP to Dovecot. Having a
> 750,000 user base. We made the switch to Dovecot in an effort to
> trim a
> little overhead on our systems. But our OS (FreeBSD 5.4 - UFS) version
> is rapidly reaching EOL. All future versions will default to UFS2.
> Dovecot seems to handle UFS correctly. But if we had known that we
> were required to write our own code to stay onboard with Dovecot, we
> would have *never* made the switch. It appears that Dovecot is not
> an appropriate choice for Production systems. But rather; better
> suited
> for hobbyists. I sure wish we had known this from the start.
Well, I'm sorry that you feel that way, but before switching I would
have supposed that you had checked that Dovecot does everything you
need it to do. Especially because UW-IMAP doesn't even *try* to
support the QUOTA extension that you obviously need so much, and that
Dovecot at least even tries to support it even if not in every single
operating system (or file system).
Doveocot isn't owned by any single company. I don't think the web
page even tries to claim anything like it anywhere. Are you saying
that I should devote my entire life to the one thing that *you*
yourself consider important to Dovecot? Even though most other people
don't really care about it?
I think I do pretty well at balancing what other people want for
Dovecot, what people (companies) pay for me to develop Dovecot to do
and what I myself want Dovecot to become. I guess in recent months
I've become worse at this since I've needed more time for school, but
in general I don't think I've done too badly.
Now, from you I've seen 3 mails within the whole Doveocot's life
time. If you had actually EVER contributed to Dovecot in any way in
its entire life time I might have replied differently. If you in no
way contribute to an open source project, you can't expect commercial
support out of it without paying for it for someone. And there are
most likely a lot of companies that would accept your money if you
wanted it (including the one I work for).
I'm happy to fix this problem for you, the standard company fee being
120 EUR/hour. Possibly even less if you can convince my supervisors
to accept it. Estimate for fixing it is about 6 hours (since I have
to install a system where I have quota). I don't think you can get
much better support than this elsewhere.
Just don't misunderstand this as me not doing anything unless someone
pays for it. For most of the last 4 years I've written Dovecot for
free without getting a single cent for it. I still do, but only as
long as I consider the changes to be important. If you have a
different opinion on the imporance, see the paragraph above.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20060613/3411d27b/PGP.pgp
More information about the dovecot
mailing list