[Dovecot] [SOLVED] quota with: postfixadmin, postfix, mysql & dovecot
Timothy Martin
tim at design1st.org
Sun Oct 1 07:05:41 EEST 2006
On Sep 30, 2006, at 7:47pm, Marcus Jodorf wrote:
> But the real problem IMHO is not bytes vs. kilobytes (solution is
> very simple as you showed above) but dovecot treating '0' values in
> the database literally. All the other programs take '0' as
> unlimited quota and therefore it's very easy to experience an
> unpleasant surprise with dovecot-lda.
>
> If you run postfixadmin as mentioned above you will probably
> completely lock out all your users with unlimited quota. I could be
> wrong here but IIRC postfixadmin uses '0' for unlimited/unset
> quota, too.
Although I agree i've seen many systems use zero for "unlimited"
wouldn't it be a bad assumption on dovecot's part? I would assume
there be a boolean that defines if the user has a quota.
For awhile I had a database where zero did mean 'unset' but that in
turn didn't mean 'unlimited' but rather was an indication that that
user should follow the domain default quota. I made a rather nice
query that evaluated and selected the greater of the domain or user
quota. But that's neither here nor there.
I would think a quota returned to dovecot as a zero should really
mean the account can't hold mail. If you want unlimited don't return
a quota value at all, which would cause dovecot to fall back on it's
default (which is easily defined as no quota at all).
FYI: as far as the bytes and kilobytes issue is concerned, my
database has an integer for megabytes :P I had to multiply instead of
divide.
.tim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20060930/044ec781/attachment.html
More information about the dovecot
mailing list