[Dovecot] Disable IMAP for certain users, but not Webmailer
Bill Cole
dovecot-20061108 at billmail.scconsult.com
Sun Aug 5 20:57:50 EEST 2007
At 8:28 AM -0700 8/5/07, Don Russell imposed structure on a stream
of electrons, yielding:
>FORMER 03 | Baltasar Cevc wrote:
>>Hi everybody,
>>
>>I'm planning to set up our new mail system using the Dovecot mailbox
>>server. It mostly works fine yet (it's quite straigt forward to set up,
>>I'd say), but there's a thing I haven't been able to find out yet. We
>>provide POP3 access for all users, but want to restrict IMAP access to
>>some of them (because IMAP users tend to leave more messages on the
>>server, thus increasing storage needs).
>>
>>
>[snip]
>
>1 - storage is cheap - Costco sells a 1 TByte external drive for
>approx $US 300. That holds a LOT of e-mail. The 500 GByte is less
>than half that price.
Storage in most business environments costs a lot more than the price
of consumer-grade disks. Physical disks are a minor component of the
true cost of providing storage in an available, reliable,
maintainable, restorable, flexible, and auditable manner.
>2 - why not enforce quotas? I assume you could set quotas by user.
Quotas are an administrative hassle even when they work technically.
In many places they also are a poor proxy for the real policy need of
retaining (and removing) mail based on age.
>POP users could opt to keep a copy on the server, so that doesn't
>guarantee anything.
There are sites which handle that through policy which they enforce
automatically and the use of Maildir. With Maildir, a script that
removes messages once they've been retrieved and/or are older than a
certain age is a pretty simple and efficient matter.
>I prefer IMAP because then I can access the same mail from different
>clients computers...
IMAP certainly provides more flexibility for users, but sometimes
that flexibility is not needed or is specifically unwanted.
--
Bill Cole
bill at scconsult.com
More information about the dovecot
mailing list