[Dovecot] use of deliver from procmail advisable?

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Charles Marcus <CMarcus at Media-Brokers.com> [2007.08.14.2028 +0200]:
>> Well, the whole point of sieve, I believe, is to make it something that an 
>> admin would want to let arbitrary users modify on their own recognizance, 
>> and the ability to specify arbitrary programs to run would be just *asking* 
>> to be hacked.
>
> Wouldn't a decent, secure alternative to procmail be sieve+amavisd-new?

Except it's not really possible to make amavisd-new do per-user spam
filtering. And it's even more of a performance hog.

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net at madduck
 
"all language designers are arrogant. goes with the territory..."
                                                         -- larry wall
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070815/3d429306/attachment.bin