[Dovecot] removing IMAP keywords?

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> [2007.08.24.1654 +0100]:
> It could be a good idea to talk about it first in imap-protocol list to
> see if other people have better ideas.

This is a good idea. However, in a thread on the mailtags mailing
list, the Mail.app MailTags author raised some concerns with using
IMAP keywords for mail tags [0], which need to be
addressed/discussed first. Basically, using an RFC821 header to
store tags in the message is a considerable contender with a major
performance downside, but it would solve the challenge of storing
tags locally in a way that *all* mail clients could use.

0. http://lists.madduck.net/pipermail/mailtags/2007-August/000038.html

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net at madduck
 
microsoft: for when quality, reliability, and security
           just aren't that important!
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070825/2d7ec9a8/attachment.bin