[Dovecot] Indexing Performance Question (was tpop3d vs dovecot)
Nate
nm_list at visp.net
Fri Feb 2 19:18:01 UTC 2007
At 09:55 AM 2/2/2007, Kenny Dail wrote:
> > What's sad with these tests is it takes 2m15s to read all the data in
> > 71570 individual files, and only 15s to do it in 1 file. Granted
> > there's a bit of overhead from the shell script looping, but not
> > *that* much! I wonder how these tests would go on a different file
> > system. I'm currently using reiserfs.
>
>actually the loop adds a lot of overhead:
>These commands were run right in a row so there is some speedup due to
>cacheing, So I repeted test a few times.
>Admittedly, this is a small maildir.
>
>bash-2.05b# ls | wc
> 1009 1009 75500
>
>bash-2.05b# time for x in `ls` ; do cat $x > /dev/null ; done
>
>real 0m3.670s
>user 0m0.347s
>sys 0m1.508s
>bash-2.05b# time cat * > /dev/null
>
>real 0m0.497s
>user 0m0.015s
>sys 0m0.071s
>bash-2.05b# time for x in `ls` ; do cat $x > /dev/null ; done
>
>real 0m2.237s
>user 0m0.356s
>sys 0m1.435s
>bash-2.05b# time cat * > /dev/null
>
>real 0m0.504s
>user 0m0.001s
>sys 0m0.086s
>bash-2.05b# time for x in `ls` ; do cat $x > /dev/null ; done
>
>real 0m2.415s
>user 0m0.356s
>sys 0m1.550s
wow, that is a ton of extra overhead. I'm doing some testing on ext3
vs reiserfs with different options and it seems that a lot of it has
to do with the filesystem and how well it handles tons of files in a directory.
What I've gotten so far using the same shell loop with 71569 small
files in the dir. Between each test the mount was unmounted and
remounted to clear cache.
ext3 defaults: 12m3s (~400k/sec of writes going on)
ext3 noatime: 11m31s (0kb/sec writes)
ext3 noatime,nodiratime: 11m43s (0k/sec of writes)
reiserfs defaults: 13m35s (~500k/sec of writes)
reiserfs noatime: 8m47s (0k/sec of writes)
reiserfs noatime,nodiratime: 9m51s (0k/sec of writes)
reiserfs noatime,nodiratime,notail: 9m59s (0k/sec writes)
The clear winner seems to be reiserfs with only the noatime option
set. I don't know why nodiratime actually slows it down (i ran these
tests multiple times to confirm it wasn't flukish results), but
perhaps it's an optimization issue with reiserfs.
- Nate
More information about the dovecot
mailing list