[Dovecot] Indexing Performance Question (was tpop3d vs dovecot)

[Timo Sirainen]

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 17:04 -0600, Richard Laager wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 14:40 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > 1.1-branch Dovecot LDA does support parsing message while saving it, but
> > in that case the ,W= isn't really needed because the size is saved into
> > cache file anyway.
> 
> Would it be useful to save it in the filename to avoid reading all of
> the file data if the cache had to be rebuilt, or would you need to read
> the file anyway?

In normal Dovecot operation the cache never needs to be rebuilt from
scratch.. But if in your environment the cache file for some reason gets
lost, then W= could benefit, especially with POP3. With IMAP it would
depend on the client.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20070205/d8e484fe/attachment.pgp