[Dovecot] v1.0.6 released

[Timo Sirainen]

On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 10:29 -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> >       DATE
> >          Sent date and time from the Date: header, adjusted by time
> >          zone.  This differs from the SENTON criteria in SEARCH, which
> >          uses just the date and not the time, nor adjusts by time zone.
> >          If the sent date can not be determined (a Date: header is
> >          missing or can not be parsed), the INTERNALDATE for that
> >          message is used as the sent date.
> 
> Very interesting... two different pages on the IETF's website have two 
> different texts for version 19 of that draft. Odd.
> 
> Anyway, at best, it would seem that the text has multiple potential 
> interpretations, because the parenthetical explanation there of what 
> it means for a sent date to be un-determinable is different from (and 
> contradictory of) what it says in section 2.2 (which is what I 
> quoted).

I think you should bring these up in imap-protocol list. I noticed this
only because I was comparing Dovecot's and UW-IMAP's SORT output and
wondered why it was different.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20071102/20180c05/attachment.bin