[Dovecot] Better flagging of errors on logs?
Timo Sirainen
tss at iki.fi
Sun Oct 21 02:07:46 EEST 2007
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:18 -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Last night dovecot died because of time changed backward.
> I noticed that the line from dovecot read
>
> Oct 9 01:00:44 mailstore16 dovecot: Time just moved backwards by 132
> seconds. This might cause a lot of problems, so I'll just kill myself now.
>
> Shouldn't such lines have the word "Error" or "Fatal"?
If you log directly to file it contains "Error:" prefix. With v1.1 it
contains "Fatal:". Currently these aren't inserted with syslog because
the logging level already contains that information. But I guess most
syslogs don't then write the level to the log, so maybe the error/fatal
prefix should be sent to syslog as well. I'm not sure.
> If I set the log_path = to a file, will syslog messages still be generated?
No.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20071021/f7d233ef/attachment.bin
More information about the dovecot
mailing list