[Dovecot] Bah! Outlook
robert at schetterer.org
Tue Apr 15 14:28:04 EEST 2008
Jason Wohlford schrieb:
> Hi All,
> I run a little hosting company. I use Dovecot 1.0.10* with IMAP
> exclusively. Lots of my customers use Outlook or Outlook Express. This
> poses a problem. These programs don't and have absolutely no workarounds
> to move messages to a trash folder when deleted. They only mark the
> message for deletion. Then, users have to purge the message to actually
> delete it. Outlook has a way to hide deleted messages and also
> auto-purge them when moving to a different folder. That just doesn't cut
> it. (Thanks Microsoft! :-p )
> So, I'm thinking Dovecot could pick up where Microsoft left off.
> It seems to me there needs to be two things done. First, a system that
> automatically copy a message marked for deletion from one folder (e.g.
> INBOX) to a trash folder (e.g. Trash, Deleted Messages, etc.) Dovecot's
> lazy_expunge might already do this, but I couldn't quite discern it from
> the wiki docs. Second, a way to only do this when Outlook or Outlook
> Express is the one who is deleting a message.
> Possibility? Comments?
> P.S. Thanks for the great software!
> *Yes, I know. I need to upgrade to Dovecot 1.0.13.
Hi Jason, forget about workarounds for outlook express
its a broken client for several reasons, just advice not not use it.
Outlook isnt Outlook , div versions with div patchlevel
working in different ways and have different ways
( or no ways ) to solve your Problem
here ist good advice for imap purge
note purge in this case ist a function
of the client which the user may handle as he likes
if you want outlook move sent mails to a imap sent folder
use a filter rule
look here for advice
at last tell your users that outlook isnt a universal mail client
specially with imap and smtp
Outlook is the client of m$ case in first case
and fits to exchanges needs,
and only with exchange it offers its workgroup funktions
which are from interest in companies
m$ has no interest to make it
better work with imap cause , they would loose money if the do so,
cause as time goes by , specially smaller companies may find
no need to buy expensive windows and exchange servers outlook licences
advice users to use thunderbird/lightning as better choice
after all i dont think dovecot should try to deal with outlook
troubles ( which are mutatating from version to version ) , as long as
there is other important stuff to do (acl etc),but for sure this not my
its mainly the work of microsoft to support user questions
about their expensive sold products not yours in my opinion
Same goes to apple mail which does serveral funny stuff with imap
All these products are formed to make money with the special services m$
and apple provides, they arent meant to be highly compatible
to wide spreaded imap,smtp opensoftware servers which mostly very clean
i know telling this truths are badly told to costumers and users in real
life , but perhaps you may do the best you can to provide such info
MfG Robert Schetterer
More information about the dovecot