[Dovecot] Fwd: [MORG] IMAP5 List

Joseph Yee jyee at ca.afilias.info
Wed Aug 13 04:52:23 EEST 2008


Timo,

Thanks for bringing it up.

I dealt with i18n MUA.  I would love to see i18n from IMAPEXT 
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5255.txt) be part of IMAP5, the mechanism, 
not all language translations, of course :)

And I guess no MUA needs to 'ENABLE' anything in IMAP5.

Joseph

PS. I had subscribed to the mailing list :)

Timo Sirainen wrote:
> If anyone's interested, especially client developers. It's been a bit 
> quiet there after the initial rush.
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Randall Gellens <randy at qualcomm.com>
>> Date: August 1, 2008 5:08:39 AM EDT
>> To: ietf-imapext at imc.org, morg at ietf.org
>> Subject: [MORG] IMAP5 List
>>
>> At the MORG BOF, a discussion as to if the proposed IMAP extensions 
>> would merely further add to the existing problem with IMAP being too 
>> hard to get right, for both clients and servers, let to a revival of 
>> the "IMAP5" discussion (previous held during the IMAP EAI 
>> discussions).  Here, "IMAP5" refers to a Big Switch (new port and 
>> version) to distinguish this revision from current IMAP.  The goal is 
>> to delete as much as possible from IMAP.
>>
>> A new mailing list now exists for this discussion on drastically 
>> slimming-down IMAP to make it easier to implement clients and servers.
>>
>> ==================================================================
>> To subscribe, click here: <mailto:imap5-request at ietf.org?body=subscribe>.
>> ==================================================================
>>
>> It's been observed that "most IMAP clients suck" and that it's hard 
>> for both clients and servers to implement.
>>
>> One reason IMAP is hard to implement is that it has a lot of options. 
>> Often there are several alternative ways to accomplish something.  It 
>> also has considerable functionality.
>>
>> Is it possible and desirable to start with the current set of (IMAP + 
>> all extensions) and consider subtracting as much as possible? The 
>> resulting protocol would still be IMAP, but not backwards-compatible 
>> with today's IMAP, since some currently-mandated items are likely to 
>> be deleted.
>>
>> General information about the IMAP5 mailing list is at: 
>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5>.
>>
>> You can subscribe and manage your subscription at 
>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5>.
>>
>> -- 
>> Randall Gellens
>> Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
>> -------------- Randomly-selected tag: ---------------
>> If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.
>> _______________________________________________
>> MORG mailing list
>> MORG at ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/morg
>> Note Well: http://www.ietf.org/maillist.html
> 



More information about the dovecot mailing list