[Dovecot] OT: PGP signature verification (was: Re: [Q] IMAP update message header?)
Thomas Zajic
zlatko at zlatko.fdns.net
Wed May 7 20:30:47 EEST 2008
* Timo Sirainen, 2008-05-07 17:54
> On May 7, 2008, at 6:45 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
>> Looks like it will probably be a case of making a copy of the message
>> adding the X-Header then copying/savinging it back as a new message
>> and deleting the old.
>
> How about just using keywords?
Does anybody know why all of Timo's mails that are sent with Apple Mail
show up as "OpenPGP: Error - signature verification failed; click Pen
icon for details" in Thunderbird 2.0.0.x/Enigmail 0.95.6?
The details just say:
| OpenPGP Security Info
|
| Error - signature verification failed
|
| gpg command line and output:
| /usr/local/bin/gpg --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty --status-fd 2 \
| --keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --verify
| gpg: Signature made Mit 07 Mai 2008 17:54:30 CEST using DSA key ID 40558AC9
| gpg: BAD signature from "Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>
OTOH, everything seems to be fine with Mutt 1.4.2.2i:
| [-- PGP output follows (current time: Mit 07 Mai 2008 18:28:17 CEST) --]
| gpg: Signature made Mit 07 Mai 2008 17:54:30 CEST using DSA key ID 40558AC9
| gpg: Good signature from "Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>"
| gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
| gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
| Primary key fingerprint: E643 F0BD FDCD 04D9 FFCB 6279 C948 5251 4055 8AC9
| [-- End of PGP output --]
|
| [-- The following data is signed --]
|
| On May 7, 2008, at 6:45 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
| >Looks like it will probably be a case of making a copy of the
| >message adding the X-Header then copying/savinging it back as a new
| >message and deleting the old.
|
| How about just using keywords?
|
|
| [-- End of signed data --]
Is it the way that Apple Mail includes the signature in some sort of pseudo
inline attachment that breaks TB's/Enigmail's MIME and/or PGP handling? Is
mutt more robust, tolerant and/or sophisticated in terms of handling PGP?
Just curious ...
Thanks,
Thomas
More information about the dovecot
mailing list