[Dovecot] deliver vs lda

[Timo Sirainen]

On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 08:29 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> > Another thing I was thinking about previously was that in process lists
> > they were prefixed with dovecot/. So the binary names could be lda,
> > imap-login, etc. but they'd show up in process lists as dovecot/lda,
> > dovecot/imap-login, etc.
> > 
> 
> 
> seems like more work for no reason, just call the binary dovecot-lda
> etc, makes it easier if you get someone not familiar with dovecot trying
> to locate it, having a temper tantrum with dovecot-lda showing up but
> unable to locate that binary :)

If I used dovecot/lda process name, then there would be $lib/dovecot/lda
binary also, not dovecot-lda.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20090408/4c4a3030/attachment.bin