[Dovecot] Scalability plans: Abstract out filesystem and make it someone else's problem
Steffen Kaiser
skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de
Fri Aug 14 12:13:45 EEST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> So yeah, either one are as reliable as the script :)
Well, I think this is not what the OP intended :)
This will work for only a little amount of mails I see, because:
a) forwarded messages differ,
b) re-sent messges differ in headers,
c) many mailing lists sent one mail per subscriber to catch user-specific
bounces (headers differ),
d) some mail relays or MTAs split the recipients list, if it is too large
(headers differ).
Although I would like it to have in Dovecot, it certainly makes same
administration stuff on the server more difficult, so I'm not sure, if I
would actually use it ... .
Bye,
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBSoUqzXWSIuGy1ktrAQKNegf/ehbepOZv7XgKo2vwJkEXqK/WcvmPJcN3
ddYOXT4Rh/E6cets5QegWMVLc6eX7M7/Uxi8HKcoa+Fg1bAJzeWkQkrPdfwcj5EI
KdkhOyx8nC8TrUC8eagKbUp6gvnF4K7TQnOBOTZh2S0rwW35HYuKRJr5OXAGdqmP
G0Xs25/AuInKrI/PW/ahmfdtI5c+pkJqg3wKhRv2MjUqsoyg5exAwjg2L+aV1K21
1rYoHNwAzRsx4DhmZJRuGTH0Me2utllvYMu3JpgzlhNIe7lRz6Cr+yuZ0MvEQ/Ey
/7lMA/U6qmPpYgmpZ4ddvPROTyiOieQ1KK54JLBW0llv7UimkgqPFw==
=HvVe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the dovecot
mailing list