[Dovecot] Apple patches 11-14
Timo Sirainen
tss at iki.fi
Wed Jan 7 01:26:28 EET 2009
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 17:06 -0600, Mike Abbott wrote:
> Patch #11 adds a few dtrace providers to key points in the code. We
> are still validating the correct placement and usefulness of these.
> One cool thing about dtrace is that when not in use the hooks
> literally are just a couple of no-op instructions.
I don't see dtrace-dovecot.h included in it.
Anyway I think the current code is too invasive. For example:
#ifdef APPLE_OS_X_SERVER
if (DOVECOT_OD_LOOKUP_START_ENABLED())
DOVECOT_OD_LOOKUP_START(in_od_info, (char *) in_user_name);
#endif
Couldn't the DOVECOT_OD_LOOKUP_START() macro be changed so that the
whole code would become simply:
DOVECOT_OD_LOOKUP_START(in_od_info, (char *) in_user_name);
And it would internally have the "if
(DOVECOT_OD_LOOKUP_START_ENABLED())" part. That also makes it simple to
get rid of the #ifdefs in .c files.
> Patch #12 increases many listen queue sizes to handle high loads
> better. The new values are not necessarily the best possible values
> but they do allow more throughput.
I guess those can be changed. I've really no idea what the tradeoffs
here are. I suppose it uses some more memory, but is it relevant with
today's memory sizes? Could they be increased even higher than your
values?
> Patch #13 makes dovecot adapt to dynamic host identity changes upon
> config reload.
Since it's not necessary to limit the domain name length, it could be
just i_strdup()ed. (I should have done this in the mbox code too.)
> Patch #14 covers three miscellaneous changes, to support more file
> descriptors
I guess this is the same as running ulimit -n before starting dovecot?
Is it useful to have this code inside Dovecot?
> and an "unlimited" number of mail processes,
+ /* APPLE - treat as "unlimited" */
+ set->max_mail_processes = 1000000;
Hmm. Is it really a good idea to allow unlimited? Anyway -1U would be
"more" unlimited. :)
> and a different default mail user.
+ "uid=98", /* _dovecot's uid */
+ "gid=6", /* _dovecot's gid */
Why does it matter which uid/gid is used for dump-capability? Maybe it
could be just run as root.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20090106/7bd1f438/attachment.bin
More information about the dovecot
mailing list