[Dovecot] Directory Layout Performance
tomas at tuxteam.de
tomas at tuxteam.de
Thu Jul 2 09:50:32 EEST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:06:24PM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> tomas at tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:48:04AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> >> Mario Antonio Garcia wrote:
> >>> From a performance perspective:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> I use a filesystem that handles this better than ext3 such as XFS or Reiser.
> >
> > Ext3 should be fine for huge directories [...]
> Not sure about maildir, but I experienced horrible performance with ext3
> on a very busy postfix queue a few years ago [...]
Thanks, Seth for this info. Definitely worth keeping in mind.
[...] Yeah, I know Reiser should have better performance with [...]
Hm. I think Reiser is for those "make sure you know what aou're doing".
I have myself some partitions on Reiser, but I'm not so sure I would
base critical stuff on it.
I'm too maxed-out at the moment to go trolling through the kernel change
logs to see whether anything might have changed in dir_index in the last
three years, but it might be interesting.
Thanks, regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFKTFi4Bcgs9XrR2kYRArk5AKCB6WdEL/+uR2S3fQYM8CGop17NuACffgbH
s+IpuDtKbl1MqZWU6GeGhYE=
=IJm2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the dovecot
mailing list