[Dovecot] Are host names a secret?

Jose Celestino japc at co.sapo.pt
Tue Jul 21 01:51:43 EEST 2009


On Qui, 2009-07-16 at 16:30 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Some time ago I added the ability for IMAP clients to fetch messages'
> GUIDs using FETCH X-GUID command. Because of a bug it wasn't working in
> 1.2.0 or 1.2.1, but I've fixed it now. But now I'm starting to wonder:
> With Maildirs the GUIDs are the maildir base filenames, which contain
> host names. Is it a bad idea to expose them to users?
> 

Don't see why. Apart from guessing the number of incoming servers we
have (we use the so inventive mailN host naming) and I cannot even see
any harm in that.

-- Jose Celestino SAPO.pt::Systems http://www.sapo.pt
--------------------------------------------------------------------- *
Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from smart
people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of smart
terminals.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20090720/1dfa4e86/attachment.bin 


More information about the dovecot mailing list