[Dovecot] Dovecot deliver with AD LDAP userdb [SOLVED]

[Timo Sirainen]

On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 15:28 -0400, Mark Schaub wrote:
> It might be worth updating the wiki to mention the reasoning behind
> using port 3268 and the implications it can cause.

Well, does the port 389 work then? It's mentioned there only because
someone complained that 389 didn't work.. Perhaps because it required
TLS? Or something, I don't know.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20091016/57fdadce/attachment.bin