[Dovecot] simple steps with sieve

[Steffen Kaiser]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:

>> But _why_ is BCC spurious? There are spurious BCC, but not in general.
>> If I BCC a message to somebody, I want to know an out-of-office state.
>> Just like for any CC or TO recipient.
>
> At least one problem is email lists created using aliases. Like
> everyone at company.com.

Even in this case, why not? I'm probably also not interested in the DSNs 
like "over quota" or something like that generated by the MTA. Actually, 
it would be nice if MTAs would pass through ESMTP RCPT's NOTIFY parameter 
(RFC 3461 sec 4.1), so the user could control the reply.

Bye,

- -- 
Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBSuiRw3WSIuGy1ktrAQIFxAgAqVSPhBB2wrAl42B+yi9e9Jz9vL9KbtPD
+2dbvpyp+3iNeM+0DZoZ3rgUgIBZ/HMRrL6jb/SNmia7W0qyHDmMViw9+BMM2UTC
WenPdz/k4VU80RtE/7glVPUl+v6+wiwpom115wUSaBxuV3YZeIfUL6KrHCb8a6vh
zc5Ebby4noqnpIQamyLLHVPded9ib748sgFDnbRoD2CEqsyXiNwf4EzaGgrQ9zQ3
jQbJ9HSIx93U5n4YZoKL/blyD1/K2V8xQ5roW+/QOkxzBM1w8HIhvwEVBjiZqJZQ
QLjyX+oQCHpIehyJPB3jwNgVh+i837RYI68G7x8REwGeMg65aNGJ6A==
=2KrB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----