[Dovecot] high imap load on large folders
Ingo Thierack
i.thierack at iwt-promotion.com
Thu Sep 10 10:06:28 EEST 2009
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> Is it actually the user CPU load or system CPU load? I'd think most of
> the time is spent on moving the new message to cur/ directory where
> there are the 58k messages.
>
>
Most time on System.
Cpu(s): 10.3%us, 87.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 1.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.7%si,
0.0%st
Mem: 775148k total, 747620k used, 27528k free, 124464k buffers
Swap: 524280k total, 60k used, 524220k free, 186376k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
COMMAND
10573 mailacce 19 0 20732 17m 5616 R 96.1 2.3 2:13.57
imap
10566 ingo 15 0 283m 273m 3544 S 1.3 36.2 3:33.49
imapsync
10602 root 15 0 2364 956 756 R 0.7 0.1 0:00.44 top
>> mail_nfs_storage: yes
>>
>
> Disable this during the sync, it'll add delays. And if you don't have
> more than one NFS client accessing the same mailbox at the same time,
> you don't need it anyway.
>
> Also see if maildir_very_dirty_syncs=yes helps.
>
>
set both parameter, no speedup. Im now on message 48000 and it takes
around 5 seconds and more to transfer one
message.
>> strace output
>>
>
> strace -tt would have been better, it would have shown timestamps then
> too. But it didn't look like it did anything unexpected.
>
found attached a short strace with -tt ;-) is it normal, that he spent
so much in entries like
08:48:30.167492 getdents64(7, /* 51 entries */, 4096) = 4080
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: strace.dat.gz
Type: application/gzip
Size: 74413 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20090910/83f1ed81/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the dovecot
mailing list