[Dovecot] Proxying Performance vs imapproxy

[Timo Sirainen]

On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 14:06 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Yeah. imapproxy probably reduces the load a bit, but it probably isn't
> anything dramatic with Dovecot. My guess is that it would only reduce
> CPU load, but if it's at ~1% already then there's not that much point..

BTW. I'm only talking about systems where mailboxes are on local disk.
With NFS each login would trigger some NFS reads which could slow things
down more. With local mails those things would already most likely be
cached in memory.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20090928/2c93f963/attachment.bin