[Dovecot] sieve vacation

[Lampa]

So if i understand this fully, you must define ALL potentional aliases
which user is member of ?

When create new alias alias1 at domain.tld and it is alias for
user at domain.tld i must edit vacation script and add :address
"alias1 at domain.tld" ? If yes, is little stupid and unmaintainable. Can
be used some wildcard * or something similar ?

2010/2/12 Martin F. Foster <martin_foster at pacific.net.au>:
> Following from Steffen Kaiser's response, RFC5230 explains the conditions
> necessary for the Sieve Vacation extension to trigger a response.
> This says:
>
> "Vacation" MUST NOT respond to a message unless the recipient user's
> email address is in a "To", "Cc", "Bcc", "Resent-To", "Resent-Cc", or
> "Resent-Bcc" line of the original message.
>
>
> So your scenario 4 happens when the sender is only in the envelope, and not
> in the headers.
>
> For example: this transaction will get a response because the mailbox
> address is in the To: header
>
> ehlo there.com
> mail from: <dude at there.com>
> rcpt to: <user at domain.tld> << envelope recipient, mailsystem routes with
> this information
> data
> To: "Some User" <user at domain.tld> << header recipient must be correlated for
> Sieve Vacation to send a response
> From: "Dude" <dude at there.com>
> Subject: message
>
> Hi there
> .
>
> This transaction will not get a response, and will trigger the "discarding
> vacation response for message implicitly delivered to <user at domain.tld> "
> log:
>
> ehlo there.com
> mail from: <dude at there.com>
> rcpt to: <user at domain.tld>
> data
> Subject: message
>
> Hi there
> .
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Martin Foster
>
>
> Le 12-Feb-10 21:00, dovecot-request at dovecot.org a écrit :
>>
>> Message: 9
>> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:18:23 +0100
>> From: Lampa<lampacz at gmail.com>
>> Subject: [Dovecot] sieve vacation
>> To: Dovecot Mailing List<dovecot at dovecot.org>
>> Message-ID:
>>        <9aef75b11002120018v69f185b5hb0a9e0f7dad1e5c5 at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> scenario:
>>
>> OK 1. created vacation script (see below)
>> OK 2. send message fromuser at anotherdomain.tld  touser at domain.tld  =>
>> got auto vacation response (2010-02-11T19:42:13)
>> OK 3. send message fromuser at anotherdomain.tld  touser at domain.tld  =>
>> no response (is ok because ":days 1" settings) (2010-02-11T19:47:46)
>> BAD 4. send message fromanotheruser at anotherdomain.tld  to
>> user at domain.tld  =>  no response (2010-02-11T19:48:04)
>>
>>
>> Why is discarding vacation response for message implicitly delivered
>> to<user at domain.tld>  ?
>>
>> log:
>> 2010-02-11T19:42:13.669321+01:00 hermes dovecot:
>> deliver(user at domain.tld): sieve:
>> msgid=<052a01caab49$ec4752e0$c4d5f8a0$@tld>: sent vacation response to
>> <user at anotherdomain.tld>
>> 2010-02-11T19:42:13.732541+01:00 hermes dovecot:
>> deliver(user at domain.tld): sieve:
>> msgid=<052a01caab49$ec4752e0$c4d5f8a0$@tld>: stored mail into mailbox
>> 'INBOX'
>> 2010-02-11T19:47:46.271534+01:00 hermes dovecot:
>> deliver(user at domain.tld): sieve:
>> msgid=<053201caab4a$b295ece0$17c1c6a0$@tld>: discarded duplicate
>> vacation response to<user at anotherdomain.tld>
>> 2010-02-11T19:47:46.275891+01:00 hermes dovecot:
>> deliver(user at domain.tld): sieve:
>> msgid=<053201caab4a$b295ece0$17c1c6a0$@tld>: stored mail into mailbox
>> 'INBOX'
>> 2010-02-11T19:48:04.958622+01:00 hermes dovecot:
>> deliver(user at domain.tld): sieve:
>> msgid=<053701caab4a$bda90220$38fb0660$@tld>: discarding vacation
>> response for message implicitly delivered to<user at domain.tld>
>> 2010-02-11T19:48:04.965875+01:00 hermes dovecot:
>> deliver(user at domain.tld): sieve:
>> msgid=<053701caab4a$bda90220$38fb0660$@tld>: stored mail into mailbox
>> 'INBOX'
>>
>> vacation script:
>> -----------
>> require "vacation";
>>
>> vacation
>> :days 1
>> :subject "Auto reply"
>>
>> "auto reply message";
>> --------------
>>
>> Thank you
>> -- Lampa ------------------------------
>
>



-- 
Lampa