[Dovecot] lazy-expunge acl bug?

[Timo Sirainen]

On pe, 2010-06-11 at 17:23 +0200, Martin Ott wrote:
> > Maybe lazy_expunge_public setting that's equivalent to lazy_expunge
> > setting, except is used for public namespaces. But ACLs could make it
> > problematic..
> 
> Maybe ACLs could be copied to the expunged folder. 

ACLs could change, so I don't think copying is ok. Adding some logic to
always use the original one's ACLs would be better, but I don't know how
difficult that would be to implement.

> There could also be an
> option whether the expunged folder inherits the original ACsL or if a global
> ACL should be applied, such that e.g. only the mailadmin gets write access to
> the expunged folder.

Some global default ACL might be easier, but that's not very flexible.

Anyway, this is pretty low priority on my todo list.