[Dovecot] dovecot user

[Marco Nenciarini]

Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 20:01 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
>>>>> "dovehole" - you go inside dovecot via a hole, right?
>>>> That is downright pornographic.  "dovehole" - "lovehole"?
>>>>
>>>> "dovenest" isn't totally horrible (close), but "dovehole" is ...  
>>>> just not
>>>> right at all.
>>> dovetail
>> +1
> 
> Tail just doesn't make much sense to me. Also it's not completely free
> of pornographic associations either. :)
> 
> So my last idea: doveless. "It's less of a dovecot process." To me it
> seems closer to perfect as anything I've seen so far.

I don't remember if 'dove-nil', 'dovenil' or 'dovenull' were suggested
by anyone. If not please consider them.

Kind regards,
Marco

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|    Marco Nenciarini    | Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| mnencia at prato.linux.it | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia       |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20100326/51e8f022/attachment.bin