[Dovecot] Ongoing performance issues with 2.0.x

Robert Schetterer robert at schetterer.org
Fri Nov 5 16:36:34 EET 2010


Am 05.11.2010 15:15, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Charles Marcus <CMarcus at Media-Brokers.com>:
>> On 2010-11-05 10:05 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> * Charles Marcus <CMarcus at Media-Brokers.com>:
>>>  
>>>> Hmmm... maybe dovecot 2.0 is doing something different from 1.2 that
>>>> causes your *live* clamdscan at delivery time to produce the heavier load...
>>>
>>> Clamdscan is not running at delivery time on that box, it's running on
>>> another machine. 
>>
>> ??
> 
> Yes, on the gateway which all mails go through
>  
>> On 2010-11-05 8:56 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> * David Ford <david at blue-labs.org>:
>>>> why don't you run clamdscan on delivery?
>>> I do.
>>
>> You plainly state that you *do* run clamdscan on delivery...
> 
> Not on this machine.
> 

Hi Ralph , ia still not clear about your problem
i understand that you do something with clam and there is difference
between dovocot versions , am i right ?

is this clamscan from amavis or at cron etc?
i use it with milter with latest 2.06
havent seen great performance problems yet, but i only have dove 1.0 to
compare on a total different machine

at last what makes you wonder about your scans?

-- 
Best Regards

MfG Robert Schetterer

Germany/Munich/Bavaria


More information about the dovecot mailing list