[Dovecot] SUMMARY: LDA vs LMTP, Cyrus SASL, verbose_proctitle
Timo Sirainen
tss at iki.fi
Tue Apr 12 17:17:10 EEST 2011
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 18:19 -0700, Joseph Tam wrote:
> Also, one significant advantage not mentioned for LMTP was that one
> delivery failure to multiple recipients can be disambiguated; LDA can only
> return an exit code to be tested by the MTA, but the MTA cannot know
> which recipient(s) generated the error.
In almost all setups MTA delivers mails to LDA one at a time. Multiple
deliveries are useful only if you want to try to get the same mail file
hard linked to all recipients. So normally this is a non-issue.
> > Lastly, toggling verbose_proctitle seems to have no effect on the output
> > of ps. Is verbose_proctitle broken for Solaris?
>
> The answer to is verbose_proctitle is broken for Solaris. There is
> no setproctitle(), and ps does not report changes to a process's argv[]:
>
> echo "main(int c,char**v){**v='x';sleep(9);}" | \
> gcc -xc -o y -; ./y; rm y &
> ps -f
IIRC /usr/ucb/ps shows the changes.
More information about the dovecot
mailing list