[Dovecot] IMAP IDLE - iPhone?

[Warren Baker]

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a reason why 172.16.0.0/12 was left out of the change ^^ ?
>
> Is it actually used? :) I've used 192.168 in my home network and all corporate networks I've seen have been 10/8. But  yeah, I guess since there aren't more than those 3 I'll just add it (I thought there were more of them, but looks like they're reserved for other purposes).


Yeah as others have mentioned - also not sure whether it is worth the
effort to support IPv6's 'private' network (fc00::/7)?
I havent seen anyone making use of this for their v6 enabled sites but
others may have input here.

thanks

-- 
.warren