[Dovecot] question about fts_squat

[Timo Sirainen]

On 18.6.2012, at 20.23, Wojciech Puchar wrote:

>> Anyway, fts-lucene backend works better than fts-squat.
> Better in what respect?
> 
> less than a second (when disk I/O was needed) fulltext search over 10000 mails doesn't look bad :)

Squat index updates are somewhat slow, especially if the index is large.