Subject tag [Dovecot] is gone

[Nick Edwards]

"has the words"     listid:dovecot.dovecot.org    (exactly as written)
seems to work well for long time


On 6/11/14, Chris Young <mrvjtod at gmail.com> wrote:
> Gmail doesn't let me filter on message headers so I've updated my filter as
> follows
>
> Before, my filter was
> SUBJECT:([Dovecot])
>
> But now my filter is
> HAS THE WORDS:(dovecot.dovecot.org OR dovecot at dovecot.org)
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Koenraad Lelong <
> dovecot at ace-electronics.be> wrote:
>
>> op 09-06-14 22:27, Timo Sirainen schreef:
>>
>>  I've actually been thinking about it almost since the beginning. It's
>>> just been annoying waste of space on my screen. And more importantly
>>> nowadays it's also breaking DKIM/DMARC signatures. So if somebody still
>>> uses Subject-based filtering it's about time to switch to List-ID header
>>> based filtering now.
>>>
>>> Another thing I'm wondering about is if I should allow text/html parts,
>>> because removing them will also break the DKIM signatures. Or mainly I'd
>>> like to allow only multipart/alternative with text/plain + text/html, but
>>> I
>>> don't think I can configure Mailman to support that.
>>>
>>>  Hi,
>>
>> Just wanted to ask what happened to "[Dovecot]" when I saw this mail.
>> Could you tell me how to find the List_ID ? I looked at the raw mail, but
>> I
>> didn't find it :
>>
>> some removed stuff and anonymized...
>> Received: from wursti.dovecot.fi (wursti.dovecot.fi [87.106.245.223])
>>         by mailbox.ace-electronics.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 808B2A0427
>>         for <dovecot<at>ace-electronics.be>; Mon,  9 Jun 2014 22:28:22
>> +0200 (CEST)
>> Received: from wursti.dovecot.fi (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
>>         by wursti.dovecot.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BC421F32;
>>         Mon,  9 Jun 2014 22:27:56 +0200 (CEST)
>> Received: from talvi.dovecot.org (unknown [137.117.229.219])
>>         by wursti.dovecot.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP;
>>         Mon,  9 Jun 2014 22:27:52 +0200 (CEST)
>> Received: from [100.90.112.97] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>>         by talvi.dovecot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0165E235C1;
>>         Mon,  9 Jun 2014 20:28:43 +0000 (UTC)
>> Received: by talvi.dovecot.org (Postfix, from userid 506)
>>         id B242523584; Mon,  9 Jun 2014 20:28:39 +0000 (UTC)
>> Received: from wursti.dovecot.fi (unknown [87.106.245.223])
>>         by talvi.dovecot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A3023584
>>         for <dovecot at dovecot.org>; Mon,  9 Jun 2014 20:28:39 +0000 (UTC)
>> Received: from [192.168.10.103] (cs181255018.pp.htv.fi [82.181.255.18])
>>         by wursti.dovecot.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6ABD221D30
>>         for <dovecot at dovecot.org>; Mon,  9 Jun 2014 22:27:43 +0200 (CEST)
>> From: Timo Sirainen <tss<at>iki.fi>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>> Subject: Subject tag [Dovecot] is gone
>> Message-Id: <A864F144-2962-4963-BEE6-5A6CBB738BDA at iki.fi>
>> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 23:27:41 +0300
>> To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org>
>> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
>> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
>> Precedence: list
>> Reply-To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org>
>> X-WatchGuard-Spam-ID: str=0001.0A0B0202.539618E6.008E,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0
>> X-WatchGuard-Spam-Score: 0, clean; 0, no virus
>> X-WatchGuard-Mail-Client-IP: 87.106.245.223
>> X-WatchGuard-Mail-From: dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org
>> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.3
>>
>> I've actually been thinking about it almost since the beginning. It's =
>> just been annoying waste of space on my screen. And more importantly =
>> nowadays it's also breaking DKIM/DMARC signatures. So if somebody still =
>> uses Subject-based filtering it's about time to switch to List-ID header
>> =
>> based filtering now.
>>
>> Another thing I'm wondering about is if I should allow text/html parts, =
>> because removing them will also break the DKIM signatures. Or mainly I'd
>> =
>> like to allow only multipart/alternative with text/plain + text/html, =
>>
>> but I don't think I can configure Mailman to support that.
>>
>