ot: accepting self certs into win pc?

[Reindl Harald]

Am 24.06.2014 17:03, schrieb Patrick De Zordo:
> Don't use self signed certs! - Buy some, or use free services! Your reputation will grow!

pfff you know what testing and private systems are?

in both cases there is no reputation that will grow and if it
comes to the trustable question - depending on the userbase
self signed ones may be more trustable than a unconditional
trusted CA somewhere from turkey..... sadly only if you remove
all the corrupt CA's out of your clients

so until you asked for what usecase the certificate are
your "buy some" is nonsense

>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] Im Auftrag von
>> voytek at sbt.net.au
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2014 15:29
>> An: dovecot at dovecot.org
>> Betreff: Re: ot: accepting self certs into win pc?
>>
>> On Wed, June 11, 2014 6:56 pm, mourik jan heupink - merit wrote:
>>
>>>> http://blog.frankleonhardt.com/2012/certificate-errors-on-internet-expl
>>>> orer-9-and-how-to-stop-them/
>>>>
>>>> I didn't mention it in the post, but IIRC this did work for making
>>>> some versions Outlook (and other Microsoft Mail things) happy at the
>> same
>>>> time.
>>>
>>> But do the above steps work for folks here..? I've tried them (IE 11,
>>> win7, outlook 2013) but outlook keeps asking about (self signed) imaps
>>> certificates.
>>
>>
>> eezy, peezy, thanks!!
>>
>> the secret ingridient was 'run as the wind', oops, 'run as admin'
>>
>> invoked IE as admin, called https:/webmail, accept,
>> bingo Outlook no longer asking, done
>>
>> thanks, Frank, thanks, guys'n'galls

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20140624/18ab187b/attachment.sig>