How about an option to disbale headers? (was Re: Patch for "doveadm -f table" nit)
Steffen Kaiser
skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de
Thu Mar 19 10:25:47 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Gedalya wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 08:49 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> There's no reason why flow and pager should write headers to stderr because
>> it would always result only in a mess. But instead of changing table
>> headers to write to stdout, I think a better fix would be to make tab
>> formatter write headers to stderr. Including headers in stdout makes it
>> more difficult to write scripts that access the actual data. For example
>> now you can do "doveadm who -1 | sort" and the output will work. If headers
>> were written to stdout you'd have to make it more complicated. Also you can
>> now easily specify what you want to do with the headers, 2>/dev/null if you
>> don't care about them or 2>&1 if you want to include them in stdout (which
>> works even after |sort).
doveadm .... 2> /dev/null
will suppress headers _and_ error messages
>> So, I'll add in my v2.3 TODO that tab formatter should write to stderr..
>
> I've been using "-f flow fetch text | sed s/^text=//" when training
> spamassasin. Couldn't find a straightforward 'fetch raw message'. Seems
> unnecessarily awkward. Moving headers to stderr would help this, though.
>
How about a formatter option to enable/disable headers at all? Like,
who -H
ps h
ps --headers
Most probably it useful for scripts only, so add an option to suppress all
headers will fit most case.
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEVAwUBVQqkK3z1H7kL/d9rAQJ/cwgApl5SvuwOcLTDqn0X/A9pCCQvuzX50oyW
FZH43AzCVcAShxX5SE8wRhmxTfI71mjQrJkvQu1zbCfh7FAY5lNP7dtTNWZRCxtI
PG1B5qfHrB/56SdnEqckYNysrF8XSoKi+0mCzzB3GaSbAWeahvVu93qh1OItfDiA
5Ago3v9l2SlJq/TM9Bo54P5jwemgI9jg9t+5PHBF7RMJY1eQ1Dd4E4IoO/PnqnzX
IKL2Xgp3YBm7eNksQWsSowfPntgb56UfLQZrQWG+7pjkDpDsKxZxTStAYcVIH6pj
//vTYrDnQP0JPwMe2iqhhrl3NyK4Wk7R1obWcezEcXhxEKFP5fn/Vg==
=m6yz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the dovecot
mailing list