Dovecot Oy merger with Open-Xchange AG
Asai
asai at globalchangemusic.org
Wed Mar 25 22:39:52 UTC 2015
Agreed. I think this is a positive move for Dovecot and Timo, Mikko, et
al. I think only good will come of this for open source communications.
On 3/25/15 2:46 PM, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
> I hate to have started this, especially the "sister" thread that has
> dissented into a flame war of what is OSS.
>
> Let me say that I believe there is nothing wrong trying to make money
> on ones efforts. Actually it is a must. How can anyone continue to put
> efforts into a project when there is no reward? Especially when most
> of the effort is by a single individual. Secondly there comes a point
> in time when any project needs help to advance. Any one individual
> will be unable to manage all the things that need to be done. It will
> either become a team effort of individuals employed elsewhere or
> somehow enter the commercial sector in some form. Both of these models
> have many examples out there and in the mean time maintaining their
> OSS root and community.
>
> What I was mostly worried about was a sudden and rapid
> commercialization of the project in such a way that it completely
> disappears from the OSS community. I will give you an extreme example
> that we had the pleasure to be involved as payed customers and
> debugging contributors: KnowledgeTree DMS. If you do not know the
> story you will simply not find it. After years of the community
> contributing to the project a sudden shift to complete
> commercialization destroyed the project entirely: ie sourceforge
> project closed, source code disappeared, mailing lists vanished even
> the domain name name closed down. If it wasn't for third party
> storage/downloading sites the project source code would have been
> practically non-existent. I consider such behavior firstly immoral
> since a project's success is not only its design but largely also its
> debugging, mostly done by thousands of unknown helpers writing their
> experiences and problems in mailing lists.
>
> I hope Timo manages well, keeps the community going but also makes a
> living (or a ton of money ) out of Dovecot. He deserves it. It is not
> impossible, others have done so successfully.
>
>
> On 25/03/15 22:46, Daniel Miller wrote:
>> On 3/19/2015 3:26 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Today I can finally announce that Dovecot Oy company has merged with
>>> Open-Xchange AG. This helps us to get more Dovecot developers,
>>> support people and so on. Most importantly, eventually it should
>>> allow me to get back to doing what I like the most: Designing new
>>> and interesting stuff for Dovecot and perfecting the old stuff :) OX
>>> is a great match to Dovecot going forward. They also really like
>>> open source and share our plans for the future. Nothing big will
>>> change as a result of this merger: Dovecot will stay Dovecot with
>>> its own name and release schedules. We're not going to force OX and
>>> Dovecot to be the same product, other than having a somewhat deeper
>>> integration between them.
>>>
>>
>> My initial impression is...sounds great! Then, after further
>> thought, and watching the flame war, I've changed my mind to...sounds
>> great!
>>
>> I'm operating under the assumption that you are continuing to be in
>> charge of Dovecot and will choose what and how to implement changes
>> and fixes. I'm further operating under the assumption that you may
>> choose to have certain features, appropriate for larger
>> installations, that you will want to receive compensation for from
>> your users. And I'm assuming that by having OX behind you, those
>> initial assumptions remain - Dovecot remains your baby, you will grow
>> it as you see fit - but now you've got some financial backing that
>> allows you more freedom to continue to develop Dovecot for
>> general-purpose use while reasonably having certain features
>> developed to support the paid model.
>>
>> If I'm mistaken then please correct me - but I'm seeing nothing but
>> upside. Certainly for you, and if you were to abandon open source
>> Dovecot today (which I've seen absolutely no indication) you've
>> already provided a tool that has a significant user base and you
>> deserve to be rewarded for it. But based on your previous actions
>> and your original post, and I have no reason not to take you at your
>> word, this sounds like a win/win for Dovecot developers and users.
>> Congratulations!
>>
--
--asai
More information about the dovecot
mailing list