mailboxes and capitalisation
Thorsten Hater
thorsten.hater at gmail.com
Tue Dec 13 15:44:54 UTC 2016
As far as I understand IMAP folders are -- largely -- case-sensitive, so I
need
to plan for Trash and trash (and worse), as there is no standard. Further,
I cannot
really expect all MUAs to honor special-use flags. My intention is to cover
the most
likely cases with autoexpunge.
I am still wondering if this behaviour is correct, given the
case-sensitivity of IMAP.
Thorsten
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Steffen Kaiser <
skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> On 12/13/2016 4:48 AM, Thorsten Hater <thorsten.hater at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have set up a series of special-use mailboxes in the default namespace
>>> differing by capitalisation of the names, mainly to capture multiple
>>> mailboxes
>>> with autoexpunge
>>>
>>> namespace inbox {
>>> ...
>>> mailbox Trash {
>>> auto = no
>>> autoexpunge = 30d
>>> special_use = \Trash
>>> }
>>> mailbox trash {
>>> auto = no
>>> autoexpunge = 30d
>>> special_use = \Trash
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> Ugh... why create such a huge pain point for yourself?
>>
>> I would never allow case sensitivity for usernames, or mail storage.
>> Makes no sense.
>>
>
> it starts with missing standards and device- or application-specific ways
> to do the same thing.
>
> - -- Steffen Kaiser
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEVAwUBWFAQwHz1H7kL/d9rAQJkxwf/ea5WVv13qiPWhEUvNSKwIAXbgUDRbxru
> YJRYvqc9MpNDi+WibI0/2KojbjH2dxMk2xTRGfDodfkDd41Eue0npKaTR1/D49YZ
> CNT34yQMHGVpGyRQbRSsLncoMTrtGx9S8xYS/JwTWXgZ6B7FFYe00ypXVp8T6mxu
> O+/yre/DUfkTZW/0pqMj2i0kbL2NAeb6A1dSOxMuOCS2U4T5ZYNB6MuA6kIZsZ+S
> ZDvRx0uNJSRpS9hjdNdRFJ/ODyAdAE97LNqJTGUwSVlXHnTo3b4ibuLWHO9F4xs0
> Cy/kRmpvxnyStcBaQqkARGefSRpp/hHI0E7X8AylDJpY4Ib38g5tmg==
> =ZiGg
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
More information about the dovecot
mailing list