Javier Henderson wrote:
On Mar 17, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Jonathan Stewart wrote:
Maykel Moya wrote:
A friend of mine passed me this[1] cause I'm recommending him Dovecot. [snip] [1] http://www.isode.com/whitepapers/mbox-benchmark.html
My first questions about this test are what version of dovecot was used, did they take into account the fact that dovecot has to build indexes? A 10s ramp-up time seems rather short for that. What kind of auth backend was used for each product and did they even attempt any kind of performance tuning on anything other than their product? This "whitepaper" comes across as extremely biased and very short on important information.
It seems to me that it was a vendor sponsored test, so one would think they designed the testing criteria to favor their product.
I know and I'm sure they did. I just had to rant a bit because this kind of thing is so common and many people don't even bother to ask questions about it and accept any "study" or "whitepaper" as gospel.
Jonathan