On 23.7.2005, at 15:33, Cor Bosman wrote:
RFC 3501 mentions this: .. It is permitted to delete a name that has inferior hierarchical names and does not have the \Noselect mailbox name attribute. In this case, all messages in that mailbox are removed, and the name will acquire the \Noselect mailbox name attribute. .. . list "" "*"
LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "foo/bar" .. Reading the above section, shouldnt I be seeing a:
LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "foo"
If you do LIST "" %, you'll see "foo" as \NoSelect folder. Maybe the RFC tries to say that.
Anyway, I don't think there is any point to leave it as \NoSelect folder. You can already create "foo/bar" directly, and CREATE explanation doesn't require that "foo" must be shown as \NoSelect with LIST *. Besides, there is no way to create a \NoSelect folder with Maildir++.
I'll anyway ask in imap list to make sure :)