On 7/9/2012 2:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.07.2012 21:29, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
On 7/9/2012 3:17 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.07.2012 07:48, schrieb Wojciech Puchar:
disagreed with my statement, then agreed with it. Apparently you didn't realize you did so. Would you please clarify what I stated that is "simply not true"? You comment WRT SSD doesn't prove anything I said to be untrue. Quite the contrary, you reinforced my statements.
Actually the only storage i use are mainstream SATA drives
ouch - that said and your offlist discussion why SAN storages are crap for you gives a picture - nobody, really nobody is using SATA for any production-storage
That's simply not true Reindl.
SATA drives are being used very widely in production today, and outnumber SAS deployments by a very wide margin.
for SOHO with no public services, yes
Google has more public facing services, servers, than anyone, and Google uses only SATA drives, zero SAS. They also host more mail spools and mailboxes than anyone. Again, all on SATA drives.
Now I'm sure you'll tell us why Google doesn't count for some reason in this discussion, why their use of SATA isn't relevant somehow.
-- Stan