11 Jun
2010
11 Jun
'10
5:45 p.m.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 04:29:07PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yes. (But with hidden=yes it's not a client-visible namespace so it's ok.)
So, if I do the combinatorics :
a) hidden = no list = no
-> the "best" or "cleaner" way to define namespace since it rewards clients which support NAMESPACE command ?
b) hidden = no list = yes
-> makes no sense to advertise a namespace which is always visible.
c) hidden = yes list = no
-> setting up namespaces in client config is mandatory
d) hidden = yes list = yes
-> a setup where we don't want to support namespaces at all
Correct ?
-- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur <hummel@pasteur.fr> | Pôle informatique - systèmes et réseau