<quote who="Gavin Henry"> > <quote who="Chris Wakelin"> >> We're happily running 1.0-beta3 in production (~20,000 users), but one > > Nice, 20k users! > >> or two users have hit the bug in the Outlook-idle workaround, which is >> fixed in 1.0-beta5 (a couple of users are now using 1.0-beta5, but I'll >> wait to see if this bug a big issue before upgrading). > > Well, that's stable enough for us ;-) > >> >> I'd agree with Odhiambo, the 1.0-betas are probably more stable than >> 0.99.x. I just get a bit jumpy when Timo replaces whole chunks of code >> in one go (like the ssl code rewrite in 1.0-beta4 that had to be >> reversed). >> >> To sum up, yes, use the betas, but maybe wait a week or so after each >> release! > > So I'll go with beta5 for now ;-) > > I am a Fedora Extras CVS committer (and the Docs steering committee, if > that matters) and just spoke to Ignacio, who does the Fedora RPMs for > dovecot. He has a yum repo for the latest versions at: > > http://fedora.ivazquez.net/yum/ > > > Use: > > http://fedora.ivazquez.net/yum/ivazquez.repo > > Once saved in /etc/yum/repos.d/ enable via:
/etc/yum.repos.d even!
yum --enablerepo=ivazquez-alternatives install/update dovecot
Will use those RRMS (thought I'd post the url for others)
Thanks,
Gavin.
Best Wishes, Chris
Gavin Henry wrote:
Dear List,
Is the latest test version suitable for production systems?
Our current servers use 0.99 on FC4 and we would like to add shared folders via the test version.
Has anyone migrated this way before?
Thanks,
Gavin.
-- --+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+- Christopher Wakelin, c.d.wakelin@reading.ac.uk IT Services Centre, The University of Reading, Tel: +44 (0)118 378 8439 Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 2AF, UK Fax: +44 (0)118 975 3094