15 Jun
2007
15 Jun
'07
11:57 p.m.
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 02:15 +0530, Rajkumar S wrote:
On 6/16/07, Łukasz Mierzwa prymitive@pcserwis.net wrote:
To spam this ml more I must say that per user db is not that good idea
I must confess that I got this idea from Zimbra. I was just curious as to why they went for this instead of the obvious one table for all users. I will of course run some benchmark and then only choose the final design.
http://www.archiveopteryx.org/schema.html http://www.archiveopteryx.org/sql-schema.html might be useful reading too.