9 Nov
2010
9 Nov
'10
7:54 p.m.
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 16:57 -0800, Scott Goodwin wrote:
Note that this is the rawlog.out, not the rawlog.in. My confusion here lies in the fact that the breakage seems to be in the out-log only. I just don't know how to read these logs. The in-log is basically exactly the same as the out-log, except that it doesn't contain the first 38 lines that the out-log contains... so does that mean the email came in just fine, but didn't go "out" ok? Or does this still confirm that the email was mangled from outside of Dovecot? Thanks ahead of time. I can send the in-log if you want.
Yeah, the in-log would have been much more useful than out-log. The important question is if in the in-log the References: header is truncated at the same point.